![dell e207wfp vs hpw2007 monitor dell e207wfp vs hpw2007 monitor](https://data2.manualslib.com/first-image/i9/41/4058/405747/dell-e2009wfp-20-lcd-monitor.jpg)
The Acer's buttons are more accessible and well labeled, but ergonomics are marred by the unfortunate placement of the power button in the center of the row of buttons, between the menu and scroll buttons.
DELL E207WFP VS HPW2007 MONITOR HOW TO
Before I read that somewhere, I couldn't figure out how to get into the menus at all. Non-intuitive layout, not labeled in any readable way, and you have to press and hold one of the buttons to get into the menus. The buttons on the Westinghouse are a pain in the to use. I was able to get a more vivid picture on the Westinghouse than on the Acer. I spent a fair bit of time playing with both of those monitors, so I may as well share my subjective impressions of them. Maybe, like the Acer X241WSD, they came with a TN in an earlier version, and switched to a VA panel without changing the model number. I have recently viewed the Westinghouse L2410NM at several different Best Buys, and none of them were TN panels. I dont believe prad has ever given a rating of "VERY GOOD" to a TN panel before, until the 2408H, so it makes me wonder.Ĭnet AU rated the 2408 with a 7.8 or so, which is actually above average for a TN panel LCD. Maybe extremetech got a defective panel? Maybe there was some other issues.
![dell e207wfp vs hpw2007 monitor dell e207wfp vs hpw2007 monitor](https://i.dell.com/images/global/products/monitors/e207_style2.jpg)
I just find it weird that two respectable places (prad and extremetech) can come out with such different experiences. I guess its easy to calibrate the gateway out of the box (it comes standard with better factory settings), but you can correct most of the problems people see with the HP with the software it comes with.
DELL E207WFP VS HPW2007 MONITOR PRO
What I dont get about extremetechs review is the HP has the EXACT same software as the gateway (just a different name) and they gave it a PRO for gateway and didnt even mention it i dont believe for the HP. Samsung is a good barebones monitor, and if you can buy it for $400 it might be the better value, but I still think the HP should be atleast a recommendation for gaming. Gateway seems to be having quality controls issues, and its $50 more (some people dont need the extra inputs, so why pay the extra $50?). I am not saying I would recommend it over the other panels, but it should be in there with it. The samsung had the same problem but I corrected it (except in DARK images there was always a slight blue tint, which I think is just a problem with TNs in general). Click to expand.Ya that was my post before the edit, I think i fixed it to an acceptable level (will test more tonight).